Blunt amendment - Is the Blunt Amendment an attack on women's health? - Video on ...

Blunt amendment : Photo Gallery

Blunt the BLUNT AMENDMENT : Ms Magazine Blog Blunt the BLUNT AMENDMENT : Ms Magazine Blog Tomorrow, the U.S. Senate will vote on the Blunt amendment–or,	Is the BLUNT AMENDMENT Constitutional? | RH Reality Check Is the BLUNT AMENDMENT Constitutional? | RH Reality Check the Blunt amendment,	Romney clarifies his position on BLUNT AMENDMENT - National ... Romney clarifies his position on BLUNT AMENDMENT - National ... "Of course I support the Blunt amendment. I thought he was talking about	Sen. Gillibrand blasts BLUNT AMENDMENT: Employers shouldn't ... Sen. Gillibrand blasts BLUNT AMENDMENT: Employers shouldn't ... Gillibrand blasts Blunt amendment: Employers shouldn't dictate health
Is the BLUNT AMENDMENT an attack on women's health? - Video on msnbc. Is the BLUNT AMENDMENT an attack on women's health? - Video on msnbc. Is the Blunt amendment an	To Put It Blunt(ly): Your Wallet and Your Health Are Under Attack To Put It Blunt(ly): Your Wallet and Your Health Are Under Attack To Put It Blunt(ly): Your	Marjorie Dannenfelser Wraps Herself in Knots Trying to Defend ... Marjorie Dannenfelser Wraps Herself in Knots Trying to Defend ... Roy Blunt's "Respect for	Elizabeth Warren | Facebook Elizabeth Warren | Facebook the Blunt amendment,
BLUNT AMENDMENT Is 'Desperate' GOP Election Strategy, Senate Dems Say BLUNT AMENDMENT Is 'Desperate' GOP Election Strategy, Senate Dems Say The Blunt amendment; Or,	HCAN Partner Missouri Progressive Vote Coalition Protests Blunt ... HCAN Partner Missouri Progressive Vote Coalition Protests Blunt ... Protests Blunt amendment	The latest pro-life news (02/27/12) - FranklinNOW The latest pro-life news (02/27/12) - FranklinNOW pro-life Blunt amendment!	Elizabeth Warren for Massachusetts Elizabeth Warren for Massachusetts the Blunt amendment -- a
The BLUNT AMENDMENT Takes Away Access to Critical Health Ins ... The BLUNT AMENDMENT Takes Away Access to Critical Health Ins ... The Blunt amendment Takes Away	Tonight's forecast: Calm, clear sky Tonight's forecast: Calm, clear sky on the Blunt amendment,	The BLUNT AMENDMENT: Be careful what you wish for, with charts ... The BLUNT AMENDMENT: Be careful what you wish for, with charts ... The Blunt amendment: Be	Daily Kos: Patrick Kennedy to Scott Brown: Stop claiming my ... Daily Kos: Patrick Kennedy to Scott Brown: Stop claiming my ... Roy Blunt's amendment
Frank Zappa: First Amendment Artist « « Vanguard Communications ... Frank Zappa: First Amendment Artist « « Vanguard Communications ...	BLUNT AMENDMENT Is Desperate GOP Election Strategy, Senate Dems Say BLUNT AMENDMENT Is Desperate GOP Election Strategy, Senate Dems Say	Is the BLUNT AMENDMENT Constitutional? « SpeakEasy Is the BLUNT AMENDMENT Constitutional? « SpeakEasy	Harry Reid BLUNT AMENDMENT Harry Reid BLUNT AMENDMENT
HiLois_ Fith Amendment.jpg (66287 bytes) HiLois_ Fith Amendment.jpg (66287 bytes)	BLUNT AMENDMENT would preserve private non-TSA airport screeners BLUNT AMENDMENT would preserve private non-TSA airport screeners	House Passes Dodd-Frank Amendments” House Passes Dodd-Frank Amendments”	Effective July 21, 2011, a Dodd-Frank amendment to the Fair Credit ... Effective July 21, 2011, a Dodd-Frank amendment to the Fair Credit ...
HR 2267 Frank Bill Amendments HR 2267 Frank Bill Amendments	OpEdNews - Quicklink: 67 Percent Oppose Blunts Health Amendment OpEdNews - Quicklink: 67 Percent Oppose Blunts Health Amendment	HR 2267 Frank Bill Amendments HR 2267 Frank Bill Amendments	Amendments Amendments
Frank Inglett : 1st Amendment Tattoo Frank Inglett : 1st Amendment Tattoo	... Snowe Opposes GOPs Anti-Contraception BLUNT AMENDMENT | ThinkProgress ... Snowe Opposes GOPs Anti-Contraception BLUNT AMENDMENT | ThinkProgress	AMENDMENT14 AMENDMENT14	... Rating and Contact Information for Senator Frank Lautenberg of NJ ... Rating and Contact Information for Senator Frank Lautenberg of NJ
BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment	BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment	BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment	BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment
BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment	BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment	BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment	BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment
BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment	BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment	BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment	BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment
BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment	BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment	BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment	BLUNT AMENDMENT BLUNT AMENDMENT Blunt amendment
Controversial Obama birth control policy faces first vote in Senate Controversial Obama birth control policy faces first vote in Senate The Senate will vote Thursday on whether or not they want to quash the so-called "conscience" amendment authored by Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo, a measure designed to counter Obama's mandate. The amendment would allow insurers and employers to opt out of any ...	Prez big: Ted Kennedy wouldn't back BLUNT AMENDMENT Prez big: Ted Kennedy wouldn't back BLUNT AMENDMENT “The characterization that Senator Kennedy would have somehow supported the Blunt amendment could not be further from the truth,” US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told reporters at Holmes Elementary School in Dorchester. US Sen.	Romney opposes, then supports, BLUNT AMENDMENT Romney opposes, then supports, BLUNT AMENDMENT Roy Blunt's amendment. It's scheduled for a vote on Thursday. Romney says he doesn't back the measure but adds that he doesn't like presidential candidates, in his words, "getting into questions about contraception within a relationship between a man ...	Romney opposes, then supports, BLUNT AMENDMENT Romney opposes, then supports, BLUNT AMENDMENT Click here Romney opposes, then supports, Blunt amendment Originally published: February 29, 2012 6:15 PM Updated: February 29, 2012 7:12 PM By The Associated Press PHILIP ELLIOTT (Associated Press) (AP) -- Republican Mitt Romney says he doesn't ...
Olympia Snowe Opposes GOP's Anti-Contraception BLUNT AMENDMENT Olympia Snowe Opposes GOP's Anti-Contraception BLUNT AMENDMENT The amendment, sponsored by Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO), would go much farther the Obama rule and allow any employer to deny coverage for contraceptives and other preventative health care services to their employees. The measure puts “your boss in your ...	Romney comes out against `Blunt-Rubio' Romney comes out against `Blunt-Rubio' By Greg Sargent Jim Heath, a reporter for ONN-TV in Ohio, just Tweeted a remarkable piece of news: Mitt Romney told him he does not support the Blunt amendment, which would empower employers and insurers to deny health coverage they find morally ...	Romney squeaks by in Michigan - IPAB-alooza returns - BLUNT AMENDMENT vote on ... Romney squeaks by in Michigan - IPAB-alooza returns - BLUNT AMENDMENT vote on ... Not so fast, says the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, which is hitting Republican candidates in Massachusetts, Montana, Nevada, Ohio and Virginia for either their support of the Blunt amendment, Planned Parenthood defunding, ...	Capitol Hill Memo: Debunking False Claims About the Blunt-Nelson Conscience Bill Capitol Hill Memo: Debunking False Claims About the Blunt-Nelson Conscience Bill Here's a memo being circulated around Capitol Hill that debunks the claims: The Respect for Rights of Conscience Act (S. 1467, HR 1179), now proposed as Blunt amendment No. 1520 to the Transportation bill, has been subjected to irresponsible ...
Kathleen Sebelius Decries 'Cynical Attempt To Roll Back Decades Of Progress In ... Kathleen Sebelius Decries 'Cynical Attempt To Roll Back Decades Of Progress In ... Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Wednesday evening sent The Huffington Post the following statement on the Blunt amendment, which is slated to have a vote in the Senate Thursday. Earlier this month, the Department of Health ...	Pressley to appear on MSNBC's 'Ed Show,' talk BLUNT AMENDMENT Pressley to appear on MSNBC's 'Ed Show,' talk BLUNT AMENDMENT By Gintautas Dumcius City Councillor At-Large Ayanna Pressley will appear on MSNBC's "The Ed Show" on Thursday night to talk about women's health issues and the controversial proposal known as the Blunt amendment. The amendment, sponsored by US Sen.	Is the BLUNT AMENDMENT Constitutional? Is the BLUNT AMENDMENT Constitutional? by Annamarya Scaccia John Harris, reporter for Politico, discusses the Blunt amendment, which would permit all employers to escape the contraceptive mandate if passed. The Obama Administration's recently-announced accommodation to the Affordable Care ...	HUFFPOST HILL - Mitt Romney (Mis)Remembers The Ladies HUFFPOST HILL - Mitt Romney (Mis)Remembers The Ladies Mitt Romney was for opposing the Blunt amendment before he was against it. And Harry Reid's idea of cocktail conversation involves long digressions about the politics of funding highway interchanges. Harry Reid probably doesn't get invited to too many ...
Romney says he does not support BLUNT AMENDMENT Romney says he does not support BLUNT AMENDMENT Roy Blunt's amendment. It's scheduled for a vote on Thursday. Romney says he doesn't back the measure but adds that he doesn't like presidential candidates, in his words, "getting into questions about contraception within a relationship between a man ...	Romney clarifies his position on BLUNT AMENDMENT Romney clarifies his position on BLUNT AMENDMENT Click here Romney clarifies his position on Blunt amendment Originally published: February 29, 2012 6:15 PM Updated: February 29, 2012 7:39 PM By The Associated Press PHILIP ELLIOTT (Associated Press) (AP) -- Presidential candidate Mitt Romney said ...	VIDEO: Catholic PAC releases ad for BLUNT AMENDMENT VIDEO: Catholic PAC releases ad for BLUNT AMENDMENT Roy Blunt, R-Mo., which is facing potential activity in Congress in coming weeks. The bill is being referred to as the Blunt amendment. Civil rights groups, women's health organizations, and even spokesmen for the White House have been warning of the ...	Today On The Trail: March 1, 2012 Today On The Trail: March 1, 2012 Democrats Attack Romney over support of Blunt amendment: Democrats are attacking Romney for supporting the Blunt amendment, which would undo the administration's contraception coverage rule by allowing employers not to cover anything they object to in ...

Blunt amendment : Videos

Romney on the BLUNT AMENDMENT on ONN Romney on the BLUNT AMENDMENT on ONN From ONN Rated: 3.1818182     Duration: 30 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:25:01 PST	Mitt Romney on the BLUNT AMENDMENT Mitt Romney on the BLUNT AMENDMENT Howie Carr Show February 29, 2012 Rated: -1     Duration: 126 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:01:45 PST	Gillibrand Fights Back Against Latest Republican Attack on Womens Health Gillibrand Fights Back Against Latest Republican Attack on Womens Health Senator Gillibrand's Floor Speech on the Overreaching Blunt amendment ... Kirsten EGillibrand ... "Senator Gillibrand" "Kirsten ... Rated: -1     Duration: 287 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:40:36 PST	Women react after talking to Scott Brown about BLUNT AMENDMENT Women react after talking to Scott Brown about BLUNT AMENDMENT Women react after talking to Scott Brown about Blunt amendment during his stop at ML Shaw's in Dracut. Rated: 4.6666665     Duration: 195 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Sat, 25 Feb 2012 13:27:34 PST
**Peter Wolfgang - Vote Yes For The BLUNT AMENDMENT** Feb. 27, 2012 Hartford TP **Peter Wolfgang - Vote Yes For The BLUNT AMENDMENT** Feb. 27, 2012 Hartford TP www.ctfamily.org youtu.be Speaking at the 3rd anniversary rally of the Hartford Tea Party, The Family Institute's Peter Wolfgang described the ... Rated: 5     Duration: 472 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:29:26 PST	Akaka opposes BLUNT AMENDMENT that would limit womens access to contraception and health services Akaka opposes BLUNT AMENDMENT that would limit womens access to contraception and health services US Senator Daniel K. Akaka (D-HI) spoke on the Senate floor to urge his colleagues to vote in opposition to the Blunt amendment. The amendment ... Rated: -1     Duration: 540 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:01:19 PST	Elizabeth Warren analyzes the BLUNT AMENDMENT with Rachel Maddow Elizabeth Warren analyzes the BLUNT AMENDMENT with Rachel Maddow February 16, 2012 Rated: 5     Duration: 363 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Tue, 21 Feb 2012 06:41:15 PST	Senator Menendez Urges Colleagues to Oppose BLUNT AMENDMENT on Senate Floor Senator Menendez Urges Colleagues to Oppose BLUNT AMENDMENT on Senate Floor Senator Menendez spoke out on the Senate floor against an amendment sponsored by Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) which would give limitless and ... Rated: -1     Duration: 488 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:15:01 PST
Senator Menendez Urges Colleagues to Oppose BLUNT AMENDMENT on Senate Floor Senator Menendez Urges Colleagues to Oppose BLUNT AMENDMENT on Senate Floor Senator Menendez spoke out on the Senate floor against an amendment sponsored by Sen. Roy Blunt (R-MO) which would give limitless and ... Rated: -1     Duration: 488 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:15:01 PST	Senator Blunt Attempts to Introduce Amendment Regarding HHS Mandate 2/9/2012 Senator Blunt Attempts to Introduce Amendment Regarding HHS Mandate 2/9/2012 US Senator Roy Blunt (Mo.) attempted to introduce a bipartisan amendment (#1520) on February 9, 2012, to the federal highway reauthorization bill ... Rated: 4.3846154     Duration: 699 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:43:26 PST	Senator Blumenthal speaking on the Senate floor in opposition to the BLUNT AMENDMENT Senator Blumenthal speaking on the Senate floor in opposition to the BLUNT AMENDMENT US Senator Roy Blunt (Mo.) attempted to introduce a bipartisan amendment (#1520) on February 9, 2012, to the federal highway reauthorization bill ... Rated: 4.3846154     Duration: 699 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:43:26 PST Rated: -1     Duration: 305 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:33:52 PST	Sen. Frankens Floor Speech Against the BLUNT AMENDMENT Sen. Frankens Floor Speech Against the BLUNT AMENDMENT Sen. Franken's gave today against the Blunt amendment, which would give employers the ability to opt out of providing health care that covers ... Rated: 5     Duration: 601 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:49:37 PST
Real News: BLUNT AMENDMENT Real News: BLUNT AMENDMENT web.gbtv.com Rated: 5     Duration: 321 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:25:43 PST	Live, from the MA BLUNT AMENDMENT Rally Live, from the MA BLUNT AMENDMENT Rally ACLUm and NARAL hosted a rally to speak out against Sen. Scott Brown's endorsement of the Blunt amendment, which would have disastrous ... Rated: -1     Duration: 86 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:08:17 PST	Romneys Blunt flip-flop More damage Romneys Blunt flip-flop More damage It's been another slip-up day for Willard M. Romney. First, he said today in an interview he's opposed to the Senate amendment which would ... Rated: -1     Duration: 366 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:20:11 PST	Romney not for the BLUNT AMENDMENT protecting right of conscience - Update: another flip flop Romney not for the BLUNT AMENDMENT protecting right of conscience - Update: another flip flop Romney was asked in an interview whether he supported the Blunt amendment (PDF) that, according to the bill purpose, seeks to amend ObamaCare to ... Rated: 5     Duration: 30 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:38:58 PST
Gillibrand Fights Back Against Latest Republican Attack on Womens Health Gillibrand Fights Back Against Latest Republican Attack on Womens Health Senator Gillibrand's Floor Speech on the Overreaching Blunt amendment ... Kirsten EGillibrand ... "Senator Gillibrand" "Kirsten ... Rated: -1     Duration: 287 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:40:36 PST	Weekly Legislative Update: Defeat the BLUNT AMENDMENT - February 28, 2012 Weekly Legislative Update: Defeat the BLUNT AMENDMENT - February 28, 2012 Senator Roy Blunt has introduced an amendment to the Surface Transportation Bill that would allow employers and insurance companies to deny health ... Rated: -1     Duration: 51 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:24:14 PST	Elizabeth Warren - Radio Ad: "Wow" Elizabeth Warren - Radio Ad: "Wow" www.elizabethwarren.com Elizabeth Warren speaks out against the Blunt amendment, a dangerous measure that would allow insurance companies and ... Rated: 4.9718308     Duration: 61 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:20:43 PST	Senator Blunt Talks with Jamie Allman Regarding HHS Mandate Amendment 2/16/2012 Senator Blunt Talks with Jamie Allman Regarding HHS Mandate Amendment 2/16/2012 US Senator Roy Blunt (Mo.) spoke with Jamie Allman on 97.1FM in St. Louis regarding Blunt's Amendment to repeal the Obama Administration's ... Rated: 3.6666667     Duration: 299 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 16 Feb 2012 07:25:41 PST
KODE: Senator Blunt Discusses Amendment to Repeal HHS Mandate 2/22/2012 KODE: Senator Blunt Discusses Amendment to Repeal HHS Mandate 2/22/2012 US Senator Roy Blunt (Mo.) spoke with Gretchen Bolander with KODE (ABC) in Joplin, Mo. regarding his amendment to repeal the Obama Administration ... Rated: -1     Duration: 328 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Thu, 23 Feb 2012 07:30:37 PST	Baucus Blasts Effort to Undermine Womens Preventive Health Care: Not on My Watch! Baucus Blasts Effort to Undermine Womens Preventive Health Care: Not on My Watch! as prepared for delivery} Mr. President, I rise to object to the Blunt amendment. This extreme amendment would undermine the delicate balance ... Rated: -1     Duration: 179 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:01:21 PST	Merkley: Stop Attacking Womens Health Care Merkley: Stop Attacking Womens Health Care Senator Jeff Merkley spoke on the floor on the need to defeat the Blunt amendment, which would give employers the right to refuse to cover certain ... Rated: -1     Duration: 593 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:57:35 PST	Let Women Speak! Advocates tell Scott Brown to protect womens health care Let Women Speak! Advocates tell Scott Brown to protect womens health care questions and told them to "get their facts straight." Learn more about the Blunt amendment and the Coalition to Protect Women's ... Rated: -1     Duration: 246 seconds     Video type: YouTube     Hosted by: www.youtube.com on Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:30:30 PST
Mitt Romney on the BLUNT AMENDMENT Mitt Romney on the BLUNT AMENDMENT Hosted by: YouTube	Rob Eno, Mara Dolan on Sen. Browns contraception stance Rob Eno, Mara Dolan on Sen. Browns contraception stance Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.com	Rob Eno, Mara Dolan on Sen. Browns contraception stance Rob Eno, Mara Dolan on Sen. Browns contraception stance Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.com	Whats next for the GOP race Whats next for the GOP race Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.com
Senator Brown continues to defend co-sponsorship of BLUNT AMENDMENT Senator Brown continues to defend co-sponsorship of BLUNT AMENDMENT Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.com	Sen. Frankens Floor Speech Against the BLUNT AMENDMENT Sen. Frankens Floor Speech Against the BLUNT AMENDMENT Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTube	Senator Brown continues to defend co-sponsorship of BLUNT AMENDMENT Senator Brown continues to defend co-sponsorship of BLUNT AMENDMENT Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.com	Senator Brown continues to defend co-sponsorship of BLUNT AMENDMENT Senator Brown continues to defend co-sponsorship of BLUNT AMENDMENT Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.com
**Peter Wolfgang - Vote Yes For The BLUNT AMENDMENT** Feb. 27 ... **Peter Wolfgang - Vote Yes For The BLUNT AMENDMENT** Feb. 27 ... Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTube	Rob Eno, Mara Dolan on Sen. Browns contraception stance Rob Eno, Mara Dolan on Sen. Browns contraception stance Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.com	So who exactly WROTE THE {BLUNT AMENDMENT} IS THIS ATTACK ON WOMEN ... So who exactly WROTE THE {BLUNT AMENDMENT} IS THIS ATTACK ON WOMEN ... Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: vodpod.com	Sen. Frankens Floor Speech Against the BLUNT AMENDMENT Sen. Frankens Floor Speech Against the BLUNT AMENDMENT Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: vodpod.comHosted by: vodpod.com
Senator Blunt Attempts to Introduce Amendment Regarding HHS ... Senator Blunt Attempts to Introduce Amendment Regarding HHS ... Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: YouTubeHosted by: NECN.comHosted by: vodpod.comHosted by: vodpod.comHosted by: YouTube	Banking Bombshell in Dodd-Frank? Banking Bombshell in Dodd-Frank? Duration: 459000 seconds Hosted by: CNBC	First Amendment Day: Frank LeMonte First Amendment Day: Frank LeMonte Duration: 60000 seconds Hosted by: vimeo	Frank Benedetti Speaks on Amendment One Frank Benedetti Speaks on Amendment One Duration: 60000 seconds Hosted by: vimeoHosted by: YouTube
Cable Highlights: ‘More Damage’ After Romney’s Blunt Flip-flop Cable Highlights: ‘More Damage’ After Romney’s Blunt Flip-flop Duration: 365000 seconds Hosted by: Hulu	When birth control became a political issue When birth control became a political issue Duration: 440000 seconds Hosted by: Bing Video	Republicans vow contraception fight isn’t over Republicans vow contraception fight isn’t over Duration: 170000 seconds Hosted by: Bing Video	BLUNT AMENDMENT Is Desperate GOP Election Strategy, Senate Dems Say BLUNT AMENDMENT Is Desperate GOP Election Strategy, Senate Dems Say Duration: 170000 seconds Hosted by: Bing VideoHosted by: HUFFPOST AolNews
Debating Chairman Franks ACORN Amendment Debating Chairman Franks ACORN Amendment Duration: 293000 seconds Hosted by: YouTube	Elizabeth Warren analyzes the BLUNT AMENDMENT with Rachel Maddow Elizabeth Warren analyzes the BLUNT AMENDMENT with Rachel Maddow Duration: 293000 seconds Hosted by: YouTubeHosted by: YouTube	Ted Nugent Explains 2nd Amendment in Blunt Language Ted Nugent Explains 2nd Amendment in Blunt Language Duration: 189000 seconds Hosted by: vimeo	Freedom of Speech VS. Son of Sam Law Freedom of Speech VS. Son of Sam Law Duration: 92000 seconds Hosted by: 5min

Blunt amendment : Latest News, Information, Answers and Websites

Amid confusion, Mitt Romney says he does support BLUNT AMENDMENT

COLUMBUS, Ohio – Mitt Romney this afternoon initially said he was opposed to legislation granting employers the right to exclude medical services from workers’ insurance on moral or religious grounds, telling an Ohio television station that ...

Olympia Snowe Opposes GOP's Anti-Contraception BLUNT AMENDMENT

18 hours ago ... Republican lawmakers have rallied around Blunt's amendment. A vote is scheduled for tomorrow, attached to an unrelated transportation bill.

From the legal and ethical perspectives, do you think it appropriate for the so-called war on terrorism to be?

similarly blunted by Constitutional rights including the Fourth and Fifth Amendments?
Answer: (America) has always been at war with (Terrorists) See "1984" by George Orwell
Category: Law & Ethics

Whats your thoughts on Habeus Corpus being suspended in US by 60 Senators?

60 senators betrayed you (it was 61, but Sen. Menendez changed his vote). They voted against an amendment to the Defense Authorization act, the indefinite suspension of Habeas Corpus. We are now officially a police state. Read the Amendment provision here. The house version of the bill is available here, 920 pages. Senate text is available here and a PDF of the full senate bill is available here, 682 pages. The amendment to the Defense Authorization act (the Udall amendment) would have removed some of the more draconian measures of the bill. To clear up some of the confusion, Sen. Udall was the good guy here. We need to remember that the text of the bill would have provided issues for people who had not been legally found guilty (no due process), just suspected. If we look back at our recent history, we can see similar legislation being misused to silence political dissidents. Are you calling for the Federal Reserve to be abolished? Are you a John Bircher? Like the Tea Party better than Occupy or vice versa? Who knows how it can be misused. Not trying to be more alarmist than needed, but we do need to remain vigilant. Ignore your rights, and they will go away. Their names are as follows: Ayotte (R-NH) Barrasso (R-WY) Blunt (R-MO) Boozman (R-AR) Brown (R-MA) Burr (R-NC) Casey (D-PA) Chambliss (R-GA) Coats (R-IN) Coburn (R-OK) Cochran (R-MS) Collins (R-ME) Conrad (D-ND) Corker (R-TN) Cornyn (R-TX) Crapo (R-ID) DeMint (R-SC) Enzi (R-WY) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Hagan (D-NC) Hatch (R-UT) Heller (R-NV) Hoeven (R-ND) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Inouye (D-HI) Isakson (R-GA) Johanns (R-NE) Johnson (R-WI) Kohl (D-WI) Kyl (R-AZ) Landrieu (D-LA) Lee (R-UT) Levin (D-MI) Lieberman (ID-CT) Lugar (R-IN) Manchin (D-WV) McCain (R-AZ) McCaskill (D-MO) McConnell (R-KY) Menendez (D-NJ) Moran (R-KS) Nelson (D-NE) Portman (R-OH) Pryor (D-AR) Reed (D-RI) Risch (R-ID) Roberts (R-KS) Rubio (R-FL) Sessions (R-AL) Shaheen (D-NH) Shelby (R-AL) Snowe (R-ME) Stabenow (D-MI) Thune (R-SD) Toomey (R-PA) Vitter (R-LA) Whitehouse (D-RI) Wicker (R-MS) http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.1867:
Answer: I'm against it.
Category: Politics

What if being racist was illegal?

The 14th amendment says you cant discriminate(just to be blunt).But yet the 1st protects bigoted remarks? I saw on this one vid where this one person said in his country (brazil) it is illegal to spout out racist stuff,but plenty of people said, while they dont agree with it and that it is wrong it is wrong for it to be illegal. Iam wondering, then what is wrong with it being illegal? I mean it is a harmful concept that is all about stiffing the freedom of others isnt it? Just because it is a belief it should be respected? Even when it is harmful? NOTE: iam not talking about having the belief, iam talking about blurting it around. So what iam basically asking is if it was would you have a problem? I... well not really. @jaker: oops my bad, thanks for the correction
Answer: The 1st amendment is a relative law, it is not absolute law, meaning that you can say whatever you want, but their are still consequences to your acts. Say if you were in a movie theater and you suddenly yelled out fire when there was none, because everyone would run out of the theater and it's more than possible that people would be hurt or die running out. You would go to jail for that. What I'm trying to say is you can say what ever you want, but you can still get in trouble for it. With discrimination it's very washy, because what is mean and hateful to one person is not all ways to another. You may think that it's common sense, but it's not common at all. A lot of the time some people may not know that they are being that way, a lot people will stop if you ask them to. Ask is the key word, you have to be nice about, and you can't tell them to. It's unrealistic to make a law to not stop people from doing and saying discriminatory things, because to everyone what it is, is different and so is it's meaning. BTW, racist means the study of race, it's a term that is used incorrectly a lot. The only correct term is discrimination.
Category: Law & Ethics

Obama camp hits Romney for supporting BLUNT AMENDMENT | The ...

“The Blunt amendment would allow any employer to deny their female employees coverage because of that employer's own beliefs,” Cutter added. “With his support of this amendment, Mitt Romney is taking important health ...

MAN IN THE NEWS | RICHARD JOHN SANTORUM; After a Childs Death, a Religious Politician Became a Cultural Warrior

WASHINGTON -- As a teenager growing up in Butler, Pa., Rick Santorum spent Sunday mornings as an altar boy, taking wheelchair-bound veterans to Roman Catholic Mass. In the ninth grade, he announced his intention to hold elective office. Im going to be governor of Pennsylvania, he declared, according to his brother Dan. Years later, as a - By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

Setting the Record Straight on the BLUNT AMENDMENT | LifeNews.com

As pro-abortion groups and Democrats in the U.S. Senate step up their attacks on the Blunt amendment, the amendment pro-life Sen. Roy Blunt is offering to restore ...

Is the BLUNT AMENDMENT an attack on women's health? - Video on ...

Video on msnbc.com: Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., shares her thoughts on the upcoming vote on the Blunt amendment, which would overturn President Barack ...

Whats the difference between what the "OBAMAs TRUTH SQUAD" is doing now and what the Nazis started in 1935?

Here s a little history lesson for you.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party - (The Nazi Party) & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws - (The Nuremberg Laws) Here is some info on "OBAMAS TRUTH SQUAD"..... http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=76308 - (Obama legal Truth Squad to target misleading ads - Sep 26) http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080927/BLOGS09/80927018 - (Gov. Blunt, GOP say Obama truth squad seeks to squash free speech with police power - Step 27) http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=76560 - (Prosecutors on Obama Truth Squad sound retreat - September 29) http://www.ktuu.com/global/story.asp?s=9095800 (‘Truth Squad comes out firing - Step 29) http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,430323,00.html - (After Hundreds of Complaints, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Finally Apologizes - Step 29) http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080930/NEWS15/80930007 (Report on Obama ’truth squad’ stirs up controversy - Step 30) http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/30/blogotics/ (Inside Blogotics/Free Speech - Step 30) And here is the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution..... First Amendment – Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause; freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly; right to petition "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances". Now what do you think about all this???? Sources: KTUU Anchorage, The Washington Times, Detroit Free Press, WorldNetDaily, The Springfield News, FOX News, & wikipedia.org (The Online Encyclopedia). NOTE: I also did a search on CNN.com & MSNBC.com for details about "OBAMAS TRUTH SQUAD". I found nothing on CNN and the only thing I found on MSNBC was two news stories dated Aug 8th, about Obama setting up a Truth squad in SC and watching the upcoming debate. THATS IT!) ----- NOW, WHY SO SILENT??? I ask again....Whats the difference between what the "OBAMAs TRUTH SQUAD" is doing now and what the Nazis started in 1935?
Answer: No dead Jews. No world war. No hitler. No oppression. Their activities are legal.
Category: Elections

Scott Brown Cosponsors BLUNT AMENDMENT On Contraception Coverage ...

Scott Brown Cosponsors Blunt amendment On Contraception Coverage, Elizabeth Warren Pounces

amendment - Roy Blunt, United States Senator for Missouri

Purpose: To amend the Patient Protection and Affordable. Care Act to protect rights of ... AMENDMENT intended to be proposed by lllllll. Viz: On page l, between ...

Why Does Mitt Romney back pedal all the time?

http://news.yahoo.com/romney-clarifies-position-blunt-amendment-003708653.html James-Not much of a Ron Paul fan, but that was funny. Joseph the Second, which seems to be working for him. I mean you see how he did last night. I guess as long as it is anti-Obama then that is okay. Sad.
Category: Elections

Blunt, opponents both wrong about conscience amendment? | Midwest ...

During his conference call with reporters Thursday Sen. Roy Blunt repeatedly insisted his proposed "conscience" amendment wasnt about access to contraception -- its ...

Mitt: I misunderstood Blunt bill question

In a radio interview on the Howie Carr show, Romney said he merely misunderstood the question on what the ONN reporter referred to as the "Blunt-Rubio amendment": ROMNEY: I didn’t understand his question. Of course I support the Blunt amendment.

Is the BLUNT AMENDMENT Constitutional? | RH Reality Check

2 days ago ... The Obama Administrationâ ™s recently-announced accommodation to the Affordable Care Actâ ™s contraceptive mandate should have put ...

Romney Sets Off Furor on Contraception Bill

Perhaps the question was poorly worded. Or perhaps it was a slip of a tired tongue. Either way, Mitt Romney created a new tempest when he told an Ohio news station that he was opposed to a Senate amendment, favored by conservatives and under debate in Congress on Wednesday, that would allow employers and insurers to limit coverage of contraceptives - By MICHAEL BARBARO and ERIK ECKHOLM

The BLUNT AMENDMENT: Be careful what you wish for, with charts ...

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) says there will be a vote on Senator Roy Blunt’s (R-MO) anti-contraception amendment — to, of all things, the ...

Romney Didn't Know What The BLUNT AMENDMENT Was | Mother Jones

Heath referred to the Blunt-Rubio amendment, but there are actually two seperate amendments—Senator Marc Rubio (R-Fla.) proposed one that deals narrowly with birth control, while Blunt's amendment, as I reported weeks ...

Birth Control Amendment Dangerous, Obama Spokesman Says

Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) co-sponsored the Blunt amendment with 19 Republicans, including moderate Scott Brown (R-Mass.). The number of GOP sponsors may grow.

Pro-Life Groups: Amendment Needed to Blunt Obama Mandate ...

The National Right to Life Committee has sent every member of the U.S. Senate a letter urging lawmakers to support the Blunt amendment that would mitigate the ...

Senate to vote on conscience amendment

The lawmakers are to vote on the so-called "conscience" amendment Thursday. The measure, sponsored by Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., is the Senate Republicans response to the controversy over a recent Obama administration directive on the type of ...

Democrats Primed for Contraception Battle With Republicans

WASHINGTON — With the cameras running and the microphones on, Congressional Democrats express outrage over Republican efforts to limit the types of health care that employers have to offer to their workers, particularly contraception. This is a fight Democrats are perfectly pleased to have. As the issue of contraception access comes to the - By JENNIFER STEINHAUER and HELENE COOPER

Daily Kos: Americans strongly oppose employer beliefs restricting ...

The Republican Senate has a problem on their hands with their full throated support of Sen. Roy Blunts amendment, which allows any employer to deny coverage of ...

In Senate, Contraception Policy Appears Set for Showdown

WASHINGTON — The Senate on Tuesday headed toward a showdown over President Obama ’s policy requiring health insurance coverage of contraceptives for women, even as Republicans appeared to be divided over the wisdom of pressing for a vote any time soon. Senate Republican leaders sought an immediate vote on legislation to overturn the - By ROBERT PEAR

Schumer: BLUNT AMENDMENT Amounts To Contraception Ban

(RTTNews) - U.S. Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) told Senate members on Wednesday that legislation proposed by Republicans would create a "contraception ban" for millions of women whose boss may have a personal objection to the use of birth control.

Is the BLUNT AMENDMENT Constitutional?

John Harris, reporter for Politico, discusses the Blunt amendment, which would permit all employers to escape the contraceptive mandate if passed. The Obama Administration’s recently-announced accommodation to the Affordable Care Act’s ...

Web Rises Up To Deflect Bills Seen as Threat

WASHINGTON -- When the powerful world of old media mobilized to win passage of an online antipiracy bill, it marshaled the reliable giants of K Street -- the United States Chamber of Commerce, the Recording Industry Association of America and, of course, the motion picture lobby, with its new chairman, former Senator Christopher J. Dodd, the - Web powerhouses backed by Internet activists rally opposition to anti-piracy legislation through Internet blackouts and cascading criticism; legislative battle over two once-obscure measures to combat the looting of online content may prove to be a turning point for how Washington does business. Photo (L) - By JONATHAN WEISMAN

Senate to Vote Thursday on Blunt's Conscience Protection ...

22 hours ago ... Sen. Roy Blunt's amendment to protect religious employers and insurers from the administration's anti-conscience mandate will receive a ...

Romney clarifies stance on BLUNT AMENDMENT: "Of course" Im for it

After suggesting Wednesday that he did not support a controversial measure allowing U.S. employers to opt out of a rule requiring them to provide employees with contraceptive health coverage, GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney quickly ...

Daily Kos: Mitt Romney comes out against BLUNT AMENDMENT to ...

One day after narrowly winning Michigan's primary by veering severely to the right, he's apparently decided it's time to flip-flop his way back to the middle, because he's now decided to come out against the Blunt amendment ...

The Pakistanis Have a Point

As an American visitor in the power precincts of Pakistan, from the gated enclaves of Islamabad to the manicured lawns of the military garrison in Peshawar, from the luxury fortress of the Serena Hotel to the exclusive apartments of the parliamentary housing blocks, you can expect three time-honored traditions: black tea with milk, obsequious - Bill Keller article details the history of Americas sometimes fraught relationship with Pakistan; notes that although Pakistan has sometimes been an unreliable and combative ally, the United States has not been the best ally to Pakistan. Drawings (L)1 - By BILL KELLER

How samrt is the Left?

Newsletter March 25, 2007 Vol 2 Issue 6 The Other White Meat When President Bush asked for an additional 22,000 troops to compliment the forces in Iraq so we can hopefully end the conflict and put this war to bed, Congress obliged. However, now that the President is asking for $92 billion in emergency spending because the previous funds will run out next month, Congress in its irresponsible wisdom has delivered a car without a gas tank. In real terms, you cant drive a car without gas and you cant fight a war without the tools needed to get the job done, especially if you are pulling a trailer full of pork. To be perfectly blunt, most of the Democrats are against the war. It does not take a brain surgeon to realize that fact. So why waste the taxpayer?s time and money to push through a useless bill that everyone knows will be vetoed anyway. Okay all of you folks who are sitting on the left side of the aisle we heard you, we got your message. We are not as stupid as you believe we are. There are people out there that want to cut off our heads. So stop playing games and get the job done right. Get back to work and do the job you were elected to do; that is to uphold the constitution and protect the people of the United States. Tacking on all sorts of useless amendments is totally counterproductive. You were elected to represent the people not try to bribe your colleagues with all sorts of goodies so they will vote in your favor. Let us examine what bribes they have tried to use. The President asked for an additional $92 billion in emergency spending. He wanted $72 billion to fund the war and $20 billion in additional Hurricane Katrina relief. Knowing that placing a timetable on the bill by itself wouldnt allow it to fly so they tacked on all kinds of pork. Some of these amendments are so ridiculous that they would insult the intelligence of a two-year-old child. They added over $24 billion that has me scratching my head. Here are just a few amendments they added on: $4 billion in additional nationwide agricultural disaster assistance. The USDA did not request the funds. Even though farm income in 2005 was in excess of $72 billion, a record high, they added an additional $4 billion, which would not be used in areas that were affected by Hurricane Katrina. Sounds like another rainy day fund, only rain is not in the forecast. $700 million to reroute a railroad line so it can make room for a private development of additional casinos along the Gulf Coast. That line is now fully functional after it was repaired at a cost of $300 million after being damaged by Hurricane Katrina. CSX is not excited about moving their tracks they rebuilt it as fast as possible to meet their customers needs because it was a critical artery. There is nothing wrong with the existing line. Dont bet on this one. $594 million in additional highway funding. This is in addition to the $286 billion that was passed last year. Only this money has nothing to do with Katrina or Iraq. It would be used for the emergency relief highway backlog across the country. The only project specifically mentioned in the committees report is the Kuhio Highway in Hawaii, which is, located over 4,000 miles away from the Gulf Coast. Sounds like another bridge to nowhere. $21 million is the amount President Bush originally wanted to restore fishery resources in the Gulf region as assistance to the seafood industry that was hard hit by Katrina. The House eliminated this portion of the bill. However, the Senate reinstated it and raised the stakes to over $1.1 billion. This is well beyond the already millions that were spent to repair and replace damaged boats and docks. Smells a little fishy to me. You are going to love this one! $3.8 billion to prepare for a potential bird flu epidemic like the last one. You know the last one that is the one where we have 500-million vaccines ready to go. The current vaccine is not scheduled to expire for at least two- years. So now, they want us to throw it all away and start over. Sounds like a bird brained idea to me. $74 million for the peanut farmers to store their crops. There is a peanut quota in the U.S. This holds down the supply and increases the price. So now, they want to hand the peanut farmers our hard- earned tax dollars to buy them storage units. I wonder if they will be located in Plains, Georgia. This sounds like a nutty idea. $400 million to help the timber industry in Oregon. This industry was originally hurt when Congress shut down harvesting the Northern timberlands to protect the Spotted Owl from being displaced. However, they have no problem displacing you and me through eminent domain if they needed our houses for a municipal parking lot. By the way, the Northern Spotted Owl originated in Mexico, they are probably here illegally. $400 million for the low-income energy assistance program. The Democrats have been blocking our efforts to drill our own oil resources. They also dont want us to increase nuclear power. So what are they going to do with the $400 million? Send me low energy light bulbs. Here is the real problem. According to the Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates the funding of the war runs out on April 15, 2007. If Congress does not act immediately, on April 15 there will be no funds available to protect our sons, daughters, brothers, sisters and friends who are fighting to keep America safe. Congress will be on Spring Break when that happens. They will be romping on the sands of Palm Beach and Santa Monica while our troops are romping on the sands of Baghdad. They will be sipping champagne and Rum Punch while our troops will be wondering where their next meal is coming from because the funds ran out. This is not the first time pork was added to an emergency spending bill. During the last go around, they tacked on a $1 million price tag for a telescope to be used to discover intelligent life in outer space. Lets start by looking for intelligent life in Washington, DC. And, that is my opinion. Michael Solomon If you want to help restore sanity to America, join the Flag Day campaign. Michael Solomon Author of Where Did My America Go?" Millie C wow you cought that ! YAAA How many people from the left will see the irony of samrt?
Answer: Consider their favorite. If Bill Clinton was smart, he would have said, when asked if he had sex with Monica, that's none of anyone's business, since there is no law against it. Or, "yes, I am human, and as a human, in a weak moment, i made a mistake. For that, i apologize to Hillary, and to Chelsea, and to the American people. Now, let's get on with running the country." He would have become instant hero. But, he chose to perjure himself, like the fool he is, was, and will forever be. -
Category: Government

Lady Republican senators not on board with BLUNT AMENDMENT to ...

The Blunt amendment is nothing more than an attempt by a handful of woman-hating men—some of whom are acting directly under orders from their churches, like Sen. Marco Rubio—to make Christian sharia law the law of ...

Whats the difference between.....?

Whats the difference between what the "OBAMAs TRUTH SQUAD" is doing now and what the Nazis started in 1935? Here s a little history lesson for you.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_Party - (The Nazi Party) & http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Laws - (The Nuremberg Laws) Here is some info on "OBAMAS TRUTH SQUAD"..... http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=76308 - (Obama legal Truth Squad to target misleading ads - Sep 26) http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080927/BLOGS09/80927018 - (Gov. Blunt, GOP say Obama truth squad seeks to squash free speech with police power - Step 27) http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=76560 - (Prosecutors on Obama Truth Squad sound retreat - September 29) http://www.ktuu.com/global/story.asp?s=9095800 - (‘Truth Squad comes out firing - Step 29) http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,430323,00.html - (After Hundreds of Complaints, the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Finally Apologizes - Step 29) http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080930/NEWS15/80930007 - (Report on Obama ’truth squad’ stirs up controversy - Step 30) http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/sep/30/blogotics/ - (Inside Blogotics/Free Speech - Step 30) And here is the 1st Amendment of the US Constitution..... First Amendment – Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause; freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly; right to petition "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances". Now what do you think about all this???? Sources: KTUU Anchorage, The Washington Times, Detroit Free Press, WorldNetDaily, The Springfield News, FOX News, & wikipedia.org (The Online Encyclopedia). NOTE: I also did a search on CNN.com & MSNBC.com for details about "OBAMAS TRUTH SQUAD". I found nothing on CNN and the only thing I found on MSNBC was two news stories dated Aug 8th, about Obama setting up a Truth squad in SC and watching the upcoming debate. THATS IT!) ----- NOW, WHY SO SILENT??? I ask again....Whats the difference between what the "OBAMAs TRUTH SQUAD" is doing now and what the Nazis started in 1935?
Answer: Barry wouldn't know the truth if it suck up behind him and bit him in the butt! This whole thing of looking for the "truth" about Sarah is a witch hunt
Category: Elections

I think Cancer is a sign from God and Im morally against treatment, can I ban my employees from treatment?

If i have a deep religious belief that Cancer is a punishment from God then I dont want my employees seeking treatment with my insurance that I provide. Can I ban this from my insurance policy? Republican Roy Blunt has an amendment that says I can. They are going to vote on it soon. Will this allow me to discriminate against all of those people? I also am morally against treating HIV, Parkingsons,Lupus,Diabetes,Arthritis, and most broken bones. Should I thank Roy Blunt for his intelligence to bring up a bill like this? Birth Control is a medical treatment for cancer and many other problems not just for birth control and this bill isnt just about that but ANY condition my employer says he is morally against.
Category: Politics

Vote on BLUNT AMENDMENT Expected Soon | Mother Jones

1 day ago ... The proposed amendment from Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) that would allow employers to have broad "moral" control over health benefits may ...

Should we put an amendment in the health care bill that says "rape is still illegal"?

After all, since the bill does not say rape is still illegal, it must become legal after this bill is passed, correct? Now I know many of you must be wondering if I got hit in the head by a large blunt object this morning. How can a bill implicitly make something illegal? Why should a bill be required to repeat laws that already exist? However, this is the same argument being used to add an amendment saying that it will not funnd abortions. Federal funding of abortions is already illegal. This bill will not change that unless it specifically says otherwise, which it does not. Dont get me wrong: I am very pro-life, and am very opposed to federal funding of abortions. But I am also not naive enough to believe that all US bills sould reiterate laws that already exist.
Answer: & here I thought this was going to be about Roman Polanski....
Category: Politics

Are you tired of the abortion topic being brought up to derail health care reform?

I will be blunt. I am pro-choice..to a degree, however Im getting tired of zealous pro-choice advocates using their dogma to impede the progress of improved health care for everyone else to which abortion does not apply. Abortion is not the only health issue! http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091223/ap_on_bi_ge/us_health_care_abortion As stated in the article..... "Currently an annually renewed law called the Hyde Amendment bars the federal government from covering abortions under Medicaid except in cases of rape, incest or where the life of the mother is threatened. Similar prohibitions cover other federal programs, although states may choose to pay for abortion coverage for people on Medicaid if they do it with state funds" Hyde Amendment http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyde_Amendment I understand that pro-choice advocates are representing low income women but this demographic isnt the only one that is going to be affected by this overhaul. Isnt it a bit selfish to solely impede progress for those without health insurance for just one demographic regarding one particular health issue?
Answer: Yes, but I feel about it the same way I feel about any sacred-cow topic that's so exhausting it sucks the air out of the room like one of those little air-fuel bombs.
Category: Gender & Women's Studies

Blunt conscience amendment dominating U.S. Senate on eve of birth control vote

WASHINGTON • One by one, senators marched to the floor this afternoon to speak passionately about an amendment that has renewed a fierce debate across the country about religion and birth control. The politically explosive legislation engineered by U.S ...

Reid Will Allow Vote on BLUNT AMENDMENT, Extending Birth Control ...

The amendment, sponsored by Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), would let employers opt out of any coverage mandates they find immoral. Reid blocked a vote on the same amendment ...

BLUNT AMENDMENT Debate Recalls Memories Of Walmart ...

Roy Blunt's (R-Mo.) amendment to the Senate transportation bill, which would override President Obama's contraception coverage rule and allow any employer to refuse to cover any kind of health care service for religious or ...

Did Republican Flip Flop King Mitt Romney break his own record with his flip on the BLUNT AMENDMENT?

The Blunt amendment , is coming up for a vote in the Senate. Most folks who have read it say it is a bill against womens reproductive health, disguised as a bill that supports religious freedoms. I for one am very happy that Republicans are going to actually vote on something like this and put their name with a bill that most likely will come back to bite them in the ass. Democrats already have the Radical Ryan plan as ammunition but this is like icing on the cake. Mitt Romney was interviewed and said he was not for it only to have his press dept come out hours later reversing Mitts stance on it and he now supports it. Even for a man like Mitt Romney was that a fast reversal? Why did Mitt cave so fast? Should we check back tomorrow on it to see if he changed again?
Category: Politics

Should we keep BOBBY JINDAL out of the White house?

His positions: Abortion and stem cell research Jindal has a 100% pro-life voting record according to the National Right to Life Committee.[33] He does not condemn medical procedures meant to save the life of a pregnant woman that would indirectly cause the termination of the pregnancy.[34][35] In 2003 Jindal was reported to have stated that he did not object to the use of emergency contraception in the case of rape if the victim requests it.[35] He opposes embryonic stem cell research[36] and voted against increasing federal funding to expand embryonic stem cell lines.[33] Same-sex marriage Jindal opposes the legalization of same-sex marriage, and has voted for the Federal Marriage Amendment to restrict marriage to a union between one man and one woman.[37] In December 2008, Jindal announced the formation of the Louisiana Commission on Marriage and Family, including individuals representing organizations that oppose same-sex marriage, including Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, Gene Mills, the executive director of the Louisiana Family Forum and Mike Johnson, senior legal counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund.[38] Tax policy As a private citizen, Jindal voted for the "Stelly Tax plan",[39] a referendum named for former state Representative Vic Stelly of Lake Charles, which swapped some sales taxes for higher income taxes. Whether or not the "Stelly Plan" is giving the desired results is still hotly debated statewide. Early Republican challenger Steve Scalise challenged Jindal on his vote for this tax plan before Scalise dropped out of the congressional race in 2004. As Governor, Jindal initially opposed reforms to the Stelly plan that would result in over $300 million in tax cuts. He later agreed to the tax cut after the legislature appeared headed to eliminating the entire personal income tax which Jindal also opposed.[40] Talk show host Moon Griffon subsequently refused to air radio ads paid for by the organization Believe in Louisiana crediting Jindal for Stelly reforms saying "Now, they are taking credit for the biggest income tax cut in the history of Louisiana and I felt like it was a lie. To be real blunt, very misleading and it was an outright lie because he had fought hard against it".[40] Civil liberties Jindal voted yes on making the PATRIOT Act permanent, voted in favor of the 2006 Military Commissions Act, supported a constitutional amendment banning flag burning,[41] and voted for the Real ID Act of 2005.[42] Jindal has an "A" rating from Gun Owners of America.[43] Health care Jindal also supports co-payments in Medicaid.[44] Offshore drilling In 2006, Jindal sponsored the Deep Ocean Energy Resources Act (H.R. 4761), a bill to eliminate the moratorium on offshore oil and gas drilling over the U.S. outer continental shelf, which prompted the watchdog group Republicans for Environmental Protection to issue him "an environmental harm demerit".[45] Jindals 2006 rating from that organization was -4, among the lowest in Congress. The nonpartisan League of Conservation Voters also censured Jindal for securing passage of H.R. 4761 in the House of Representatives; the group rated his environmental performance that year at seven percent, citing anti-environment votes on 11 out of 12 critical issues. Jindals lifetime score from the League of Conservation Voters is seven percent.[46] Despite claims that Jindals bill was successful,[47] H.R. 4761 was replaced by S 3711 (known as the Domenici-Landrieu Fair Share Plan). The original Senate version was passed by both houses of Congress and signed by President Bush.[48] Earmarks In 2007, Jindal led the Louisiana delegation in Congressional earmark funding. According to Taxpayers for Common Sense, in 2007, Jindals earmark funding was 14th among all Congressmen.[49] As Governor in 2008, Jindal used his line item veto to strike $16 million in earmarks from the state budget while allowing $30 million in legislator added spending.[50] Intelligent design Jindal supports the teaching of "intelligent design" in public schools.[51] Despite calls for a veto from groups as diverse as the the Roman Catholic Church, the ACLU, the National Review, and Jindals own biology professors at Brown University.[52] Jindal signed the Louisiana Academic Freedom Act in 2008. Crime and punishment On June 25, 2008, Jindal signed the "Sex Offender Chemical Castration Bill", authorizing the chemical castration of those convicted of certain sex offenses.[53] Jindal has also voted against giving the federal government jurisdiction to help local law enforcement with hate violence based on sexual orientation, gender identity, gender and disability.[54]
Answer: We should keep all Republicans out of the White House until they admit the following: 1. You cannot govern a nation of over 300 million with "small government." 2. If a free society will not help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. (JFK, 1/20/1961 and still true today) 3. You don't have to agree with a woman's choice, but you damn well better respect her right to make it. You wouldn't let someone tell your wife whether to have a child, so why should you tell anyone else? 4. There is no provision for a high-speed rail line from Las Vegas to Disneyland in the Obama stimulus plan, and there never was. Stop lying about it! 5. The Republican plan on, well, everything these days is obstruction. You guys have no plans on, well, anything, so don't say you do, because you're lying -- again! 6. A Republican criticizing the federal government's response to Hurricane Katrina is like Alex Rodriguez criticizing another player for steroid use. Pardon the pun, but it doesn't hold water. 7. You guys were kicked out of office not because you "betrayed your conservative principles," but because you held true to them. We have had enough! Jindal spoke of his family, and said Americans could do anything. After that, to borrow author Mary McCarthy's zinger, every word he said was a lie, including "and" and "the."
Category: Politics

Romney clarifies his position on BLUNT AMENDMENT

Presidential candidate Mitt Romney said Wednesday he opposed Senate Republicans effort that critics say would limit insurance coverage of birth control, then reversed himself quickly in a second interview saying he misunderstood the question.

how is this paper? it is for my college english class. i still need conclusion. this is a rough draft.?

The Idea of American Injustice Just six weeks after the September 11th attacks on the world Trade Center and the Pentagon, Congress passed the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act gives investigators the power to spy on its own citizens. Since the terrorist attacks of September 11th and the Patriot Act, the rights of citizens of the United States and prisoners being held in camps such as Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib have been violated by the United States breaking the Geneva Convention. The idea of American justice is slowly becoming the idea of American injustice. So what is the Patriot Act and what does it give investigators the power to do? The Patriot Act allows investigators to wiretap phone lines, do a search called a “sneak and peak”, which allows investigators not have to obtain warrants, search a home and tell the person after they have searched their home. The Patriot Act also allows investigators to obtain personal information (books taken from library, every type of purchase, etc.). A website made by the Department of Justice, www.lifeandliberty.org, states that the Patriot Act has prevented another attack on America since September 11th, 2001 (Preserving 519). Indeed, the Patriot Act has likely prevented another terrorist attack, but at the cost of our constitutional rights? The Patriot Act violated the rights given to us by the Constitution, mainly the First and Fourth Amendment. The First Amendment is nonexistent since the Patriot Act was passed. Investigators can wiretap phone lines and go into our personal life and look at books we’ve read and things we bought. This totally ruins the foundations laid out by the First Amendment, which gives us our freedoms (religion, speech, press, right to petition and assembly) that have since been taken away from us. The “sneak and peak” which was earlier mentioned and part of the patriot Act violated the rights given to us by the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment gives people the right against unreasonable searches of homes, warrants must be obtained to search home, and the person must be notified that their house is being searched. With the “sneak and peak”, investigators are allowed to go into a house without a warrant and also can go into a house without giving notice to people whose things have been searched (Surveillance 521). With the War on Terror in full swing, we are trying the best we can to capture terrorists and obtain information vital for us to remain safe in the United States. We hold these “suspected” terrorists in prison camps such as Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib. But, are the troops and investigators overseas following the Geneva Convention, signed in 1949? The Geneva Convention protects prisoners of war. Prisoners must be treated like humans and must be protected against acts of violence. In 2003, two detainees in an Afghan interrogation facility were killed. They were found with “blunt” injuries to the legs and lower body. Eighteen months has passed and there has yet to be a full military investigation (Barry 549). At the time, Donald Rumsfeld said that the Geneva Conventions are being followed by the United States but continued to state that “the Geneva Conventions rules do not necessarily mean that all detainees will get all the rights and privileges normally accorded prisoners of war” (549). So why don’t they get the same rights that all prisoners should be allowed to have? Investigators are using torture and violence to force prisoners to tell them things they want to hear. They believe they are doing what is best for the country. In their minds, in order to protect the country they need to use any kind of force possible to get these terrorists to speak, or America may be attacked again.
Answer: Sorry but i really dont know anything abt american justice par anyways i really hope tht someone will help u out !!! BEST OF LUCK !!!
Category: Homework Help

Reid will allow vote on repeal of administrations birth control ...

As quickly as the White House moved last week to tamp down the furor over original its mandate, congressional Democrats are hardly shying away from the Blunt amendment.

Senate to vote on controversial contraception amendment

The so-called "conscience" amendment, sponsored by Sen. Roy Blunt of Missouri, is the Senate Republicans response to the simmering controversy over a recent Obama administration decision to mandate the type of health care coverage religious ...

OpEdNews - Quicklink: 67 Percent Oppose Blunts Health Amendment

Blunts amendment would allow employers to deny coverage of health services to their employees on the basis of their personal moral objections. by seiuhealthcare775nw ...

Sen. Blunt defends amendment on birth control coverage as freedom of religion issue

WASHINGTON _ One by one, senators marched to the floor Wednesday afternoon to speak passionately about an amendment that has renewed a fierce debate across the country about religion and birth control. The politically explosive legislation engineered by Sen.

After Many Tough Choices, the Choice to Quit

WASHINGTON — The looming Senate vote on a Republican plan to give employers the right to withdraw health care coverage based on religious and moral convictions put Senator Olympia J. Snowe in a tough but familiar position: weighing her own views as a Republican centrist against pressure from fellow Republicans to support the party position. A - By JONATHAN WEISMAN

Is the BLUNT AMENDMENT Constitutional? « SpeakEasy

Article printed from speakeasy: http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy. URL to article: http://blogs.alternet.org/speakeasy/2012/02/29/is-the-blunt-amendment-constitutional/. Photobucket. Written by Annamarya Scaccia for RH ...

Democrats Attack Pro-Lifers Ahead of BLUNT AMENDMENT Vote

Leading Democrats are aggressively attacking pro-life advocates and lawmakers who want a vote on the Blunt amendment tomorrow to mitigate the problems associated with the new mandate pro-abortion President Barack Obama put in place. Leading pro ...

Romney Camp Blames BLUNT AMENDMENT Answer On 'Confusing ...

Blunt and Rubio both have separate amendments, the latter which is more limited in terms of services to which employers can claim conscientious objection, but Rubio did also co-sponsor Blunt's amendment. You could argue ...

how is this paper? I still need a conclusion. It is only rough draft.?

The Idea of American Injustice Just six weeks after the September 11th attacks on the world Trade Center and the Pentagon, Congress passed the Patriot Act. The Patriot Act gives investigators the power to spy on its own citizens. Since the terrorist attacks of September 11th and the Patriot Act, the rights of citizens of the United States and prisoners being held in camps such as Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib have been violated by the United States breaking the Geneva Convention. The idea of American justice is slowly becoming the idea of American injustice. So what is the Patriot Act and what does it give investigators the power to do? The Patriot Act allows investigators to wiretap phone lines, do a search called a “sneak and peak”, which allows investigators not have to obtain warrants, search a home and tell the person after they have searched their home. The Patriot Act also allows investigators to obtain personal information (books taken from library, every type of purchase, etc.). A website made by the Department of Justice, www.lifeandliberty.org, states that the Patriot Act has prevented another attack on America since September 11th, 2001 (Preserving 519). Indeed, the Patriot Act has likely prevented another terrorist attack, but at the cost of our constitutional rights? The Patriot Act violated the rights given to us by the Constitution, mainly the First and Fourth Amendment. The First Amendment is nonexistent since the Patriot Act was passed. Investigators can wiretap phone lines and go into our personal life and look at books we’ve read and things we bought. This totally ruins the foundations laid out by the First Amendment, which gives us our freedoms (religion, speech, press, right to petition and assembly) that have since been taken away from us. The “sneak and peak” which was earlier mentioned and part of the patriot Act violated the rights given to us by the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment gives people the right against unreasonable searches of homes, warrants must be obtained to search home, and the person must be notified that their house is being searched. With the “sneak and peak”, investigators are allowed to go into a house without a warrant and also can go into a house without giving notice to people whose things have been searched (Surveillance 521). With the War on Terror in full swing, we are trying the best we can to capture terrorists and obtain information vital for us to remain safe in the United States. We hold these “suspected” terrorists in prison camps such as Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib. But, are the troops and investigators overseas following the Geneva Convention, signed in 1949? The Geneva Convention protects prisoners of war. Prisoners must be treated like humans and must be protected against acts of violence. In 2003, two detainees in an Afghan interrogation facility were killed. They were found with “blunt” injuries to the legs and lower body. Eighteen months has passed and there has yet to be a full military investigation (Barry 549). At the time, Donald Rumsfeld said that the Geneva Conventions are being followed by the United States but continued to state that “the Geneva Conventions rules do not necessarily mean that all detainees will get all the rights and privileges normally accorded prisoners of war” (549). So why don’t they get the same rights that all prisoners should be allowed to have? Investigators are using torture and violence to force prisoners to tell them things they want to hear. They believe they are doing what is best for the country. In their minds, in order to protect the country they need to use any kind of force possible to get these terrorists to speak, or America may be attacked again. college english paper
Answer: The paper is fairly well presented. I disagree with the theme and tone but that isn't what you asked. Your points are generally well-argued except for the claim that "The First Amendment is nonexistent since the Patriot Act was passed." The First Amendment says Congress shall make no laws abridging the freedoms you list. It does not say Congress shall plug its ears when we speak. In other words, the FACT that the government can listen in on conversations does not, of itself, deprive us of a right guaranteed by the First Amendment. I think you would have to try to argue that because of governmental intrusion, people are afraid to speak; or people have otherwise been prohibited from stating an opinion. The fact that you are writing this paper goes against that argument. You may be better off leaving the First Amendment out and arguing the Fifth (due process) and Sixth (right to counsel) Amendments are being violated. Your Fourth Amendment claim is better laid out. I think your paper may be stronger if you find another word or phrase for "investigators." Your point is that the Government is violating our rights. Stick with that. Unless you say "the Government" or "Government investigators" you weaken the impact of your argument. Using the term "investigators" lets the reader forget it's the government doing this. Don't let Big Brother off the hook. Will your conclusion be a call to action to repeal the Patriot Act? WIll you suggest an alternative? You don't seem to contest the assertion that the Patriot Act has prevented further terrorist attacks. Will you conclude that terrorist attacks are a lesser evil than the loss of personal freedom by the Patriot Act? You've done a good job writing this paper and I'd love to read it when completed.
Category: Homework Help

5th and 8th amendment, do they really dis-allow torture?

I am Pro-Torture and am writing an essay on it. Now, the only factor from the 5th amendment that makes torture illegal is that there is no jury or trial. That can easily be fixed if we set up Torture warrants for extreme/important situations. Yet the 8th Amendment says there should be "no cruel or unusual punishments". That is pretty easy to understand and it is blunt. Yet the 8th amendment is very broad and has left us to define "cruel" and "unusual". Torture is definately Cruel and Unusual. BUT, think of this scenario: A man walks into a gas station in the middle of no where. He pulls out a gun and holds everyone hostage until his demands are met. Many people would believe this is a good time for the police to shoot that person if they can. Because in order to save the hostages inside the gas station, the police have to violate the physical rights of the man with the gun. Compare this scenario to something more serious: There is a terrorist attack planned. We know minor details and it is crucial to prevent the attack. We have a few suspects but there is no way of knowing if they know the precise details we need. Is it better to wait for the attack to come, and hope our methods will be efficient for preventing the attack? Or should we try to get the answers quicker by torturing the suspects? If we refuse to torture, we are favoring the rights of the terrorists over the people being victimized. Sure, I know, torturing doesnt nessessarily give us the correct information. Suspects are liable of lying to get away from the pain. But if we combine our civil methods of gaining information and the possible information we may gain from suspects, we could prevent an attack much quicker and efficiently. We must use logic and reason to determine whether the information the suspect has given us is reliable. With all the information I have given you, is it better to favor the rights (5th and 8th amendments) of the terrorists over innocent victims because torture is very painful? Is it better for hundreds or thousands, or even a couple of people to die in order to save the rights of the terrorists? Sorry guys, I had to write this quickly so please forgive my unorganization.
Answer: Actually it would be Article 6 of the Constitution, second paragraph, that ultimately dis-allows torture: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." To clarify, see the Third and Fourth Geneva Conventions and the United Nations Convention Against Torture, all signed *and ratified* by the United States. A lot of folks who say we should heed the letter of the Constitution often ignore this little section, because they think that the United States should be above international law. You can see our Founding Fathers didn't feel that way, and stated (with a distinct lack of ambiguity) that all Treaties shall have the SAME level of law as the Constitution itself. Thus, the Constitution, via the Geneva Conventions, disallows torture.
Category: Law & Ethics

THE FEMALE FACTOR; For Indian Women, a Long Wait for Equality in Parliament

NEW DELHI -- As its winter session wound down last week, it was clear that the Indian Parliament would remain a male bastion for the near future. The lower house, almost 90 percent male in its composition, had ensured that a bill intended to increase the number of female members would not be passed for at least another year. In March 2010, - By NILANJANA S. ROY

Sen. Gillibrand blasts BLUNT AMENDMENT: Employers shouldn't dictate ...

Sen. Gillibrand blasts 'invasive' Blunt amendment ... Roy Blunt (R-MO), was offered as an amendment to an unrelated transportation bill in response to new federal government rules regarding contraception coverage.

EDITORIAL; Rejected in Tucson

The Tucson Unified School District has dismantled its Mexican-American studies program, packed away its offending books, shuttled its students into other classes. It was blackmailed into doing so: keeping the program would have meant losing more than $14 million in state funding. It was a blunt-force victory for the Arizona school superintendent, - Editorial scores Tucson, Ariz, schools superintendent John Huppenthal, whose determination that districts Mexican-American studies program violated a law cracking down on ethnic studies programs has resulted in the program being shut down; argues that the shutdown is a challenge to Tucson school officials to draft a new curriculum whose honesty and excellence all of Tucsons teachers and students can be proud of. (M)

Mitt Romney Clarifies Stance On BLUNT AMENDMENT [UPDATE]

In an interview with Ohio News Network on Wednesday, Mitt Romney said he opposed a controversial amendment that would allow employers to opt out of covering any kind of health benefit for moral reasons. But minutes after his answer was broadcast ...

For G.O.P., Pipeline Is Central to Agenda

WASHINGTON -- Just six months ago, Keystone for many Americans was the state nickname for Pennsylvania. But now Keystone, the Canadian pipeline, has become a centerpiece of the Republican economic and political agenda, and the partys preferred truncheon against President Obama. On the airwaves, on the campaign trail and in both chambers of - Keystone XL pipeline has become a centerpiece of the Republican economic and political agenda, as well as a key issue to attack Pres Obama; message has permeated conservative airways, the primary campaign trail and both chambers of Congress. Photos (M)l - By JENNIFER STEINHAUER

The BLUNT AMENDMENT; Or, the Contraceptives Issue Turns

BOB SCHIEFFER: Well, I-- I guess what Im asking you though is-- is are you willing to go as far as Senator Blunt now wants to go and just write in ...

Prez big: Ted Kennedy wouldn’t back BLUNT AMENDMENT

The late U.S. Sen. Edward M. Kennedy’s stance on religious contraception exemptions for religious employees is being “terribly mischaracterized,” one of President Obama’s Cabinet secretaries said while visiting a Hub elementary school yesterday.

Blunt Trauma: Hundreds Rally in St. Louis Against Sen. Blunts ...

Blunt Trauma: Hundreds Rally in St. Louis Against Sen. Blunts Amendment to Let Your Boss Control Your Life

Romney clarifies statement on BLUNT AMENDMENT

WASHINGTON — Presidential candidate Mitt Romney said Wednesday he opposed Senate Republicans effort that critics say would limit insurance coverage of birth control, then reversed himself quickly in a second interview saying he misunderstood ...

Population Connection: Defeat the BLUNT AMENDMENT

Senator Roy Blunt (R-MO) has introduced an amendment to the Affordable Care Act that would allow any employer to refuse to cover any health service for any reason. It ...

Daily Kos: Petition:STOP BLUNT AMENDMENT It Allows Employer To ...

Senator Roy Blunts Amendment, S.AMEND 1520 to S.1813 (text below), is clear in that it allows Employers to Deny Health "Services" to anyone they please so long as ...

Capitol Hill Memo: Debunking False Claims About the Blunt-Nelson Conscience Bill

1467, H.R. 1179), now proposed as Blunt amendment No. 1520 to the Transportation bill, has been subjected to irresponsible accusations that it would greatly expand the ability of employers and others to delete beneficial services from the health plans they ...

The BLUNT AMENDMENT Takes Away Access to Critical Health Insurance ...

Home > Our Issues > Health Care & Reproductive Rights > Barriers to Reproductive Care > The Blunt amendment Takes Away Access to Critical Health Insurance Coverage ...

BLUNT AMENDMENT Debate Recalls Memories Of Walmart ...

19 hours ago ... Proponents of Sen. Roy Blunt's (R-Mo.) amendment to the Senate transportation bill, which would override President Obama's contraception ...

Parties clash over scope of BLUNT AMENDMENT - The Hill's Healthwatch

1 day ago ... Senate Democrats said Tuesday that up to 20 million women could lose access to healthcare services under an amendment from Sen.

Vote for Blunt conscience protection amendment. Robert Wade , Seguin, Tx 78155?

To Senator Cornyn: Would you vote for the Blunt consience protection amendment. Thanks, Robert Wade, Seguin, Tx. 78155
Category: Law & Ethics

STOP the BLUNT AMENDMENT | USAction

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform met this morning to continue to play politics with women’s health. Chairman Darrell Issa refused to allow a ...

@chucktodd confused Ron Paul voters are wondering why this Blunt amendment is about...
From: bradstinks - Source: Twitter for iPhone

1-*WJ: Ben Cohen (Ben & Jerrys Co-.. | 2-Blunt Contraception Amendment Deb.. | 3-Constitutionality of the 2010 Heal.. http://t.co/kPSw4Kgw
From: CSPANnow - Source: Schedule Tweeter

RT @mdomb: Remember: Call Scott Brown 617-565-3170 to tell him you oppose the Blunt amendment. It doesnt matter if you already called, call again.
From: Amh4Elizabeth - Source: web

Does Blunt amendment allow denial of coverage to gay spouses?
From: fakestevehoban - Source: Twitter for iPhone

RT @AVD911: Dear @RNC we will be keeping track of all Senators who vote FOR the Blunt amendment aka anti-women/contraception. Our twitter #P2 will rock!
From: AllenColby1 - Source: web

davy jones dead, hines ward, snooki pregnant, monkees, branson missouri, Blunt amendment, sch http://t.co/4pkjDcmw
From: hottrendtoday - Source: hottrendsdaily

davy jones dead, hines ward, snooki pregnant, monkees, branson missouri, Blunt amendment, sch http://t.co/1UNtF1Kj
From: servicebz - Source: hottrendsdaily

Video: Meteor Blaze... awesome!!! @ http://t.co/AxtzhW37 #Blunt amendment
From: PinoyVideosTK - Source: PTK Tweeter

RT @AVD911: Dear @RNC we will be keeping track of all Senators who vote FOR the Blunt amendment aka anti-women/contraception. Our twitter #P2 will rock!
From: OUCOFA - Source: web

Call your Senator today! REJECT THE Blunt amendment! Keep your laws off my body!
From: ChristyChapter2 - Source: web

@joshtpm what is worse mitt not knowing what Blunt amendment was or mitt flip flopping on it
From: laylaamed - Source: web

RT @mdomb: Remember: Call Scott Brown 617-565-3170 to tell him you oppose the Blunt amendment. It doesnt matter if you already called, call again.
From: francosarmy - Source: web

RT @Mildavk63: Daily Kos: Mitt Romney comes out against Blunt amendment to … http:tcoVQxrwniO
From: lundintmillie - Source: Mobile Web

Romney comes out against `Blunt-Rubio’ [UPDATED] http://t.co/4I7jarjz WOW, the inevitable #GOP nominee takes a swing with Obama at 1st Amend
From: SylenceDogood - Source: Twitter for Android